Decentralized
Live Video APP:
Powered by Community
Build audio/video conferencing and livestreaming on a decentralized infrastructure.
Save up to 95% on real-time experiences. Enjoy transparent pricing with open source code
-
Cost-Effective
-
Easily customizable
-
Scalability
-
Open source
-
Decentralized
Go from 1:1 audio/video calls
to large-scale live streams
Audio/Video Conferencing
Great for compact classrooms, fitness apps, social platforms and more
Up to 100,000
participants
Under 500ms
latency
Live Streaming
Ideal for extensive classrooms, virtual events, live commerce and more
Up to 100,000
participants
Under 500ms
latency
Built on Open Source
Vidorium's stack—media server, client apps, auxiliary services -
remains perpetually free and open source.
remains perpetually free and open source.
Participant-minute/data/MAU, your time us up
Choose a competitor and tariff:
Choose a competitor:
For example, for a 30-minute
video conference with 10
participants, Vidorium can hold
1440 sessions, while Twilio
will only hold 34 sessions
video conference with 10
participants, Vidorium can hold
1440 sessions, while Twilio
will only hold 34 sessions
For example, for a 30-minute
video conference with 50
participants, Vidorium can hold
1440 sessions, while Twilio
will only hold 67 sessions
video conference with 50
participants, Vidorium can hold
1440 sessions, while Twilio
will only hold 67 sessions
For example, for a 30-minute
video conference with 200
participants, Vidorium can hold
1440 sessions, while Twilio
will only hold 65 sessions
video conference with 200
participants, Vidorium can hold
1440 sessions, while Twilio
will only hold 65 sessions
For example, for a 30-minute
video conference with 500
participants, Vidorium can hold
1440 sessions, while Twilio
will only hold 60 sessions
video conference with 500
participants, Vidorium can hold
1440 sessions, while Twilio
will only hold 60 sessions
For example, for a 30-minute
video conference with 10
participants, Vidorium can hold
1440 sessions, while Agora
will only hold 34 sessions
video conference with 10
participants, Vidorium can hold
1440 sessions, while Agora
will only hold 34 sessions
For example, for a 30-minute
video conference with 50
participants, Vidorium can hold
1440 sessions, while Agora
will only hold 67 sessions
video conference with 50
participants, Vidorium can hold
1440 sessions, while Agora
will only hold 67 sessions
For example, for a 30-minute
video conference with 200
participants, Vidorium can hold
1440 sessions, while Agora
will only hold 65 sessions
video conference with 200
participants, Vidorium can hold
1440 sessions, while Agora
will only hold 65 sessions
For example, for a 30-minute
video conference with 500
participants, Vidorium can hold
1440 sessions, while Agora
will only hold 60 sessions
video conference with 500
participants, Vidorium can hold
1440 sessions, while Agora
will only hold 60 sessions
For example, for a 30-minute
video conference with 10
participants, Vidorium can hold
1440 sessions, while Vonage
will only hold 34 sessions
video conference with 10
participants, Vidorium can hold
1440 sessions, while Vonage
will only hold 34 sessions
For example, for a 30-minute
video conference with 50
participants, Vidorium can hold
1440 sessions, while Vonage
will only hold 67 sessions
video conference with 50
participants, Vidorium can hold
1440 sessions, while Vonage
will only hold 67 sessions
For example, for a 30-minute
video conference with 200
participants, Vidorium can hold
1440 sessions, while Vonage
will only hold 65 sessions
video conference with 200
participants, Vidorium can hold
1440 sessions, while Vonage
will only hold 65 sessions
For example, for a 30-minute
video conference with 500
participants, Vidorium can hold
1440 sessions, while Vonage
will only hold 60 sessions
video conference with 500
participants, Vidorium can hold
1440 sessions, while Vonage
will only hold 60 sessions
For example, for a 30-minute
video conference with 10
participants, Vidorium can hold
1440 sessions, while 100ms
will only hold 34 sessions
video conference with 10
participants, Vidorium can hold
1440 sessions, while 100ms
will only hold 34 sessions
For example, for a 30-minute
video conference with 50
participants, Vidorium can hold
1440 sessions, while 100ms
will only hold 67 sessions
video conference with 50
participants, Vidorium can hold
1440 sessions, while 100ms
will only hold 67 sessions
For example, for a 30-minute
video conference with 200
participants, Vidorium can hold
1440 sessions, while 100ms
will only hold 65 sessions
video conference with 200
participants, Vidorium can hold
1440 sessions, while 100ms
will only hold 65 sessions
For example, for a 30-minute
video conference with 500
participants, Vidorium can hold
1440 sessions, while 100ms
will only hold 60 sessions
video conference with 500
participants, Vidorium can hold
1440 sessions, while 100ms
will only hold 60 sessions
For example, for а live streaming
(Full HD, 1080p) with 10
viewers, Vidorium provides
a stream for 730 hours, while
Livekit only for 0.6 hours
(Full HD, 1080p) with 10
viewers, Vidorium provides
a stream for 730 hours, while
Livekit only for 0.6 hours
For example, for а live streaming
(Full HD, 1080p) with 50
viewers, Vidorium provides
a stream for 730 hours, while
Livekit only for 3 hours
(Full HD, 1080p) with 50
viewers, Vidorium provides
a stream for 730 hours, while
Livekit only for 3 hours
For example, for а live streaming
(Full HD, 1080p) with 200
viewers, Vidorium provides
a stream for 730 hours, while
Livekit only for 12 hours
(Full HD, 1080p) with 200
viewers, Vidorium provides
a stream for 730 hours, while
Livekit only for 12 hours
For example, for а live streaming
(Full HD, 1080p) with 500
viewers, Vidorium provides
a stream for 730 hours, while
Livekit only for 30 hours
(Full HD, 1080p) with 500
viewers, Vidorium provides
a stream for 730 hours, while
Livekit only for 30 hours
For example, for a 30-minute
video conference with 10
participants, Vidorium can hold
1440 sessions, while Video
will only hold 34 sessions
video conference with 10
participants, Vidorium can hold
1440 sessions, while Video
will only hold 34 sessions
For example, for a 30-minute
video conference with 50
participants, Vidorium can hold
1440 sessions, while Video
will only hold 89 sessions
video conference with 50
participants, Vidorium can hold
1440 sessions, while Video
will only hold 89 sessions
For example, for a 30-minute
video conference with 200
participants, Vidorium can hold
1440 sessions, while Video
will only hold 87 sessions
video conference with 200
participants, Vidorium can hold
1440 sessions, while Video
will only hold 87 sessions
For example, for a 30-minute
video conference with 500
participants, Vidorium can hold
1440 sessions, while Video
will only hold 80 sessions
video conference with 500
participants, Vidorium can hold
1440 sessions, while Video
will only hold 80 sessions
Our Applications
to kickstart your journey
Solutions we have developed to showcase Vidorium's potential
Video Conferencing
An open source video conferencing application
built on Vidorium components and decentralized servers
built on Vidorium components and decentralized servers
Spatial Meeting
A tiny 2D world you can join, navigate, and both see and hear other users, experiencing their audio in stereo according to their relative position and distance
WebRTC CDN
with low latency
Vidorium's global decentralized mesh network allows every user
to connect to a server at the edge resiliently. Host a 1:1 meeting
or an interactive 10:10000 live stream using the same APIs
to connect to a server at the edge resiliently. Host a 1:1 meeting
or an interactive 10:10000 live stream using the same APIs
100k
participants / room
100ms
low latency

Vidorium is a decentralized,
open-source app
that provides access to audio/video
conferences and live streaming
Thanks to the active participation of an independent community, Vidorium users receive a high-quality, scalable, secure, and resilient product
Connect and get free 50 Mbps bandwidth every month for ∞ online participants